Sappho: A New Rendering — Text and Context

(0 User reviews)   1792
Sappho, Stacpoole, H. De Vere (Henry De Vere), 1863-1951 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2013 Not confirmed
Women -- Greece -- Poetry; Lesbos (Greece : Municipality) -- Poetry; Sappho -- Translations into English Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 7,404
Reading time 33 min
Text sections 1

Sappho: A New Rendering — Text and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 7,404 words, 33 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.

The text analysis averages about 22.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Women -- Greece -- Poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This editorial note examines H. De Vere Stacpoole's 1915 rendering of Sappho, focusing on his authorial choices in diction, dialogue, and description. It highlights how the translator frames Sappho's remoteness, uses fragmentary evidence, and crafts a dramatic monologue for the poet's voice.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.3/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Sappho lies remote from us, beyond the fashions and the ages, beyond sight, almost beyond the wing of Thought, in the world's extremest youth.

To thrill the imagination with the vast measure of time between the world of Sappho and the world of the Great War, it is quite useless to express it in years, one must express it in æons, just as astronomers, dealing with sidereal distances, think, not in miles, but in light years.

Between us and Sappho lie the Roman Empire and the age of Christ, and beyond the cross the age of Athenian culture, culminating in the white flower of the Acropolis.

Had she travelled she might have visited Nineveh before its destruction by Cyaxares, or watched the Phœnicians set sail on their African voyage at the command of Nechos. She might have spoken with Draco and Jeremiah the Prophet and the father of Gautama the founder of Buddhism. For her the Historical Past, which is the background of all thought, held little. but echoes, voices, and the forms of gods, and the immediate present little but Lesbos and the Ægean Sea, whose waters had been broken by the first trireme only a hundred and fifty years before her birth.

Men call her the greatest lyric poet that the world has known, basing their judgment on the few perfect fragments that remain of her song. But her voice is more than the voice of a lyric poet, it is the voice of a world that has been, of a freshness and beauty that will never be again, and to give that voice a last touch of charm remains the fact that it comes to us as an echo.

For of Sappho's poetry not a single vestige remains that does not come to us reflected in the form of a quotation from the works of some admirer, some one captured by her beauty or her wisdom or the splendour of her verse, or some one, like Herodian or Apollonius the sophist of Alexandria, who takes it to exhibit the æolic use of words or accentuation, or Hephæstion, to give an example of her choriambic tetrameters.

Only one complete poem comes to us, the Hymn to Aphrodite quoted by Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and one almost complete, the Ode to Anactoria, quoted by Longinus; all other quotations are fragments: a few lines, a few words, a word, the merest traces.

What fate gave us the shipping lists of Homer, yet denied us Sappho; preserved the _Lexicon Græcum lliadis et Odysseæ_ of Apollonius, yet cut the song to Anactoria short, and reduced the song of the orchard to three lines? or decided that Sophists and Grammarians, exhibiting dry-as-dust truths, should be a medium between her and us?

Some say that her works were burned at Constantinople, or at Rome, by the Christians, and what we know of the early Christians lends colour to the statement. Some that they were burned by the Byzantine emperors and the poems of Gregory Nazianzen circulated in their place.

But whatever the fate it failed in its evil intention. Sappho remains, eternal as Sirius, and it is doubtful if her charm and her hold upon the world would have been strengthened by the full preservation of her work.

As it is, added to the longing which all great art inspires, we have the longing inspired by suggestion. That lovely figure belonging to the feet she shows us "crossed by a broidered strap of Lydian work," would it have been as beautiful unveiled as imagined? Did she long for maidenhood? Why did the swallow trouble her, and what did the daughter of Cyprus say to her in a dream?

There is not a fragment of Sappho that is not surrounded in the mind of the reader by the rainbow of suggestion. Just as the gods draped the human form to give desire imagination, so, perhaps, some god and no fate has all but hidden the mind of Sappho.

Looking at it in another way one might fancy that all the demons of malignity and destruction had conspired to destroy and traduce: to destroy the works and traduce the character of the poet.

The game of defamation was begun in Athens in the age of corruption by lepers, and carried on through the succeeding ages by their kind, till Welcker came with his torch and showed these gibbering ghosts standing on nothing and with nothing in their hands.

Stacpoole's rendering opens not with a poem but with a meditation on temporal distance: Sappho lies 'beyond the fashions and the ages, beyond sight, almost beyond the wing of Thought.' This choice of diction—'æons' rather than years, comparisons to 'the world of the Great War'—immediately establishes the translator's authorial hand. He does not pretend to offer direct access to the ancient poet; instead, he foregrounds the mediation of time and the fragmentary nature of the surviving evidence. The prose introduction, written in a lyrical yet analytical voice, sets the stage for the poems that follow, which are presented as a continuous dramatic monologue rather than discrete fragments.

Framing the Fragmentary

Stacpoole explicitly addresses the condition of Sappho's corpus: 'of Sappho's poetry not a single vestige remains that does not come to us reflected in the form of a quotation.' He names the grammarians and sophists—Herodian, Apollonius, Hephæstion—who preserved her words as examples of dialect or meter. This meta-commentary is unusual for a poetic rendering; it functions as a scholarly frame that acknowledges the textual lacunae. The translator speculates on the destruction of her works, citing 'the early Christians' and 'Byzantine emperors,' but does not claim certainty. By doing so, he invites the reader to view the ensuing poems as reconstructions, not originals.

The Voice of Sappho in Monologue

The poems themselves are rendered as a first-person dramatic monologue, with Sappho addressing Phaon directly. Stacpoole's diction shifts between colloquial intimacy and heightened emotion: 'You! you! who left me without kiss or tear / Or word' contrasts with 'Grief turned me then to stone, / Voiceless I stood as though I ne'er had sung.' The translator employs repetition and exclamation marks to convey urgency. Notably, the monologue includes a reported dream sequence—'In dreams our limbs are joined, as flame with flame'—and a suicide leap from the Leucadian rock, a mythic trope. The voice is consistent: passionate, self-aware, and rhetorically structured.

Description as Emotional Landscape

Stacpoole uses natural description to mirror Sappho's emotional state. In the second section, a spring is described: 'through whose cool water shows / The sand like silver, clear as seen through air.' This serene image is immediately juxtaposed with the spirit's call to leap from the Leucadian cliff. Later, the grove where the lovers met becomes desolate: 'The herbs lie withered, and the birds that move / Are songless, and the very trees are grey.' The landscape is not merely decorative; it functions as an extension of the speaker's grief. The recurring motif of the sea—'the blue, blue waves that call'—reinforces the pull toward oblivion.

Diction and the Rhetoric of Loss

Stacpoole's lexical choices emphasize absence and longing. Words like 'lost,' 'gone,' 'empty,' and 'never' recur throughout the monologue. The speaker addresses Phaon as 'my lost delight' and describes herself as 'for ever more alone.' The translator also employs classical allusions—Aurora, Cephalus, Cynthia, Endymion—that situate Sappho's personal grief within a mythological framework. Yet the diction remains accessible: 'I had no words to tell you at the last / But these: "Forgo not life, forget not me."' The balance between learned reference and direct emotional appeal characterizes Stacpoole's authorial approach throughout the rendering.

Readers approaching this rendering should attend to the interplay between Stacpoole's prose introduction and the poetic monologue. The translator's decisions—to frame Sappho as remote, to present her work as a continuous narrative, and to infuse the landscape with psychological weight—shape the experience of the text. Rather than seeking historical accuracy, the rendering offers a coherent voice that reflects early twentieth-century sensibilities about ancient lyric. Consider how the translator's diction and descriptive choices construct a version of Sappho that is both intimate and mediated.

There’s a particular ache in Stacpoole’s Sappho—her fragments feel like rooms left mid-sentence. It made me think of Ovid’s cooler, wryer remedy, where love’s aftermath is treated like a lingering cough. Both writers circle the same hollow: how we reconstruct what’s gone. I found comfort in the contrast, thumbing through Remedia Amoris; or, The Remedy of Love Literally Translated into English Prose, with Copious Notes — Text and Context, as if one voice could quiet the other.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks